I've watched yet another large-circulation newspaper make sweeping changes to their book review section. From the Publisher's Weekly article [emphasis added]: Sullivan, the VP of Communications for the LA Times, confirmed that this was a cost-saving move but would not provide details on the number of freelancers who were eliminated last week. “ Staff writers from outside the book department will take over for those who left. We have not changed our commitment to book coverage or the amount of space the Times will devote to it.” I find it fascinating that no reference is made to the quality of the content the LA Times will offer, going forward. Parceling out review assignments outside the book department doesn't bode well. They aren't the first news organization to revamp their book-related content. Back in 2009, the Washington Post did something similar , condensing and consolidating what had once been a fully separate section. Is it just a sign of the economy,...
Muse-Plagued Author